Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3

David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2008, at 13:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>> One thing that jumps at me is pgTAP usage, as Zdenek said. I
>> understand that it's neat and all that, but we can't include the
>> tests because they won't run unless one installs pgTAP which seems a
>> nonstarter. So if you want the tests in the repository along the
>> rest of the stuff, they really should use pg_regress.
>
> It does use pg_regress. The test just load the included pgtap.sql file
> to get the tap functions, and then away they go. If you run `make
> installcheck` it works.

Uh-huh, OK, that's fine then I guess.

--
Alvaro Herrera

http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers