appropriately. I could care less though.
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Gregory Stark <email@example.com> wrote:
> "Jonah H. Harris" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> So, would anyone be averse to something like the following:
>> ALTER TABLE blah ADD ... PRIMARY KEY (...) USING PREBUILT INDEX index_hame
>> If the user doesn't specify CONSTRAINT constraint_name, it will
>> default to current implicit behavior of col_pkey.
> This is all so that the primary key shows up with a nice "PRIMARY KEY" instead
> of just the unique index?
> The "PREBUILT" seems unnecessary in that syntax.
> Gregory Stark
> Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | email@example.com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: