Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: PageLayout footprint

Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Similar is 32/64 bit compilation. It is handled on x86 by MAXALIGN but
> MAXALIGN is same on SPARC for both binaries, but I'm not sure if it
> works correctly.

Are 32/64-bit binaries on Sparc incompatible, then? Does our control
file check catch it? If not, what's causing it, and would the
--footprint switch catch it?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers