> I rather wonder whether -L has any reason to live at all. initdb's
> default is to locate PGSHAREDIR relative to where it finds the backend
> executable, which is consistent with what the backend itself is going
> to do. Is there any scenario where specifying a different location
> wouldn't be broken?
I think the -L option only exists for legacy reasons.
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
No comments:
Post a Comment