Re: [pgsql-www] Insecure DNS servers on PG infrastructure

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:02:03AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> If it says FAIR or POOR then you have an unpatched server or there
>>> is something interfering with the port randomization. If the server
>>> is behind a NAT firewall then the latter is entirely likely.
>
>> There's no reason that a NAT should do that, if the device is
>> competently built: if you randomise source ports on the inside, the
>> NAT device could just use the same port on the outside.

Tom can you check if this has been resolved? If not I am going to start
paging people.

Joshua D. Drake

--
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www