On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com> wrote:
> At the cost of one bit of storage, you have compatible types using
Thanks for your review and feedback! Unfortunately, I do need the full range
of the unsigned types for the project I am looking at. The reason I started
working on these types is because it seemed wasteful to use the next size
larger signed integer for the storage type of the unsigned integer.
Thanks for the suggestion!
- Ryan
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
No comments:
Post a Comment