Re: [HACKERS] notification information functions

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> I suggest:
>>
>
>
>> pg_listened_events(out event name) returns setof record
>> pg_pending_events(out event name, out message text) returns setof record
>>
>
>
>> The first would show events being listened on by the current backend,
>> while the second would show all pending events for the current db.
>>
>
> pg_listened_events seems reasonable, but what's a "pending event"?
> If you mean stuff that hasn't yet been removed from the shared circular
> buffer, it seems like that would be too transient (not to mention
> implementation-dependent) to be interesting.
>
>
>

Fair enough. I'm all for less work ;-)

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers