> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: RIPEMD160
>>
>>
>>> from remus which is in austria shows no problem for the last 24h) we had
>>> two runaway cvsps processes in the git jail(which is on the same
>>> physical host as the wiki) that more or less hogged all the CPU on the box.
>> Oh for Pete's sake, can we please get away from jails and just use
>> dedicated servers? We've had enough people volunteer hardware and
>> time to make this happen.
>
> No we haven't - not even remotely. At a rough count we'd need at least
> another 17 servers (based on the current number of VMs), and we'd lose
> the ability to move services between hardware quickly and easily. Oh,
> and we'd have the management headache of dealing with a bunch more
> hosting providers, as I doubt the current ones will give us that many
> boxes.
*cough*
Yes I think they would.
That being said :) I think its a mistake. It would be a complete waste
of resources to go to dedicated machines. Some of the machines we have
we hardly use at this point.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
No comments:
Post a Comment