Sunday, September 7, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] Prototype: In-place upgrade v02

Tom Lane wrote:
> I didn't see anything that looked like an immediate change in user table
> contents, unless they used the "name" type; but what of relation forks?

Relation forks didn't change anything inside relation files, so no
scanning of relations is required because of that. Neither will the FSM
rewrite. Not sure about DSM yet.

Heikki Linnakangas

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

No comments: