Re: [HACKERS] Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:41:56PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:55:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > IMHO a utility command should do one easily-explained thing. The
> > fewer options the better.
>
> Sticking to that principle makes for a better-maintained system. I
> agree. If we want to point out, "You might rename your index
> afterwards to make it look like other default primary keys," I have
> no objection.

For convenience, it might be nice to include the generated name in the
notice.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers