> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> I agree with that for pg_clog and friends, but I'm much more leery of
>> folding WAL into the same framework.
> Well it may still be worthwhile stealing buffers from shared_buffers even if
> we set a special flag marking them as owned by WAL and out of bounds for
> the normal buffer manager.
> At least that way we could always steal more if we want or return some, as
> long as we're careful about when we do it.
... and as long as you can acquire the WAL per-buffer management space out
of nowhere ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
No comments:
Post a Comment