Monday, June 2, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] Overhauling GUCS

On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:

> Most people I have seen will increase one or few but not all parameters
> related to memory which can result in loss of performance and
> productivity in figuring out.

If it becomes easier to build a simple tool available to help people tune
their configurations, that should help here without having to do anything
more complicated than that.

> What happened to AvailRAM setting and base all memory gucs on that.

Like some of the other GUC simplification ideas that show up sometimes
(unifying all I/O and limiting background processes based on that total is
another), this is hard to do internally. Josh's proposal has a fair
amount of work involved, but the code itself doesn't need to be clever or
too intrusive. Unifying all the memory settings would require being both
clever and intrusive, and I doubt you'll find anybody who could pull it
off who isn't already overtasked with more important improvements for the
8.4 timeframe.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

No comments: