Re: [HACKERS] Confusing message in log file

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>> May 14 21:38:40 sfphotodb001 postgres[29658]: [20-1] 2008-05-14 21:38:40
>> PDTLOG: parameter "shared_buffers" cannot be changed after server start;
>> configuration file change ignored
>>
>> The message probably should be rephrased to say that this setting
>> (shared_buffers) will not be changed.

> Actually, no one else has been confused by this wording before, and I
> can't think of better wording that doesn't sound redundant.

How about "... after server start; change ignored" ?
Or "attempted change ignored" ?

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers