Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> If this were a nice pluggable library I'd agree, but AFAIK it's not, and
> I don't see great value in reinventing the wheel.
I certainly agree.
However, I thought of it more like the archive_command, as proposed by
Hannu. That way we don't need to reinvent any wheel and still the
standby could trigger the base data synchronization itself.
Regards
Markus Wanner
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
No comments:
Post a Comment