> Simon Riggs wrote:
> I think we'll need an option to specify a maximum for the number of WAL
> files to keep around. The DBA should set that to the size of the WAL
> drive, minus some safety factor.
>
> > It should be clear that to make this work you must run with a base
> > backup that was derived correctly on the current master. You can do that
> > by re-copying everything, or you can do that by just shipping changed
> > blocks (rsync etc). So I don't see a problem in the first place.
>
> Hmm, built-in rsync capability would be cool. Probably not in the first
> phase, though..
Built-in? Why? I mean make base backup using rsync. That way only
changed data blocks need be migrated, so much faster.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
No comments:
Post a Comment