Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] Synchronous Log Shipping Replication

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>>
>> Signals and locking, borrewed from Postgres-R, are now studied
>> for the purpose in the log shipping,
>
> Cool. Let me know if you have any questions WRT this imessages stuff.

If you're sure it's all right, I have a trivial question.

Which signal should we use for the notification to the backend from
WAL sender? The notable signals are already used.

Or, since a backend don't need to wait on select() unlike WAL sender,
ISTM that it's not so inconvenient to use a semaphore for that notification.

Your thought?

regards

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

No comments: