Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] parallel pg_restore

On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:14:33 +0200
"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl> wrote:

> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>There are in fact very few letters available, as we've been fairly
> >>profligate in our use of option letters in the pg_dump suite.
> >>j and m happen to be two of those that are available.
> >--max-workers
> Perhaps, but please do not use that as justification for using -m.
> That would be equally silly as abbreviating "number of workers" to -n.

Actually I came up with it because it coincides with existing
terminology. Autovacuum has the concept of max_workers.

Joshua D. Drake

The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

No comments: