> Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > How is this supposed to interact with argument names ?
>
> Yeah, the real problem with this proposal is that it conscripts a syntax
> that we'll probably want to use in the future for argument-name-based
> parameter matching. The proposed behavior is not nearly as useful as
> that would be.
I am not at all convinced about the proposed feature, but is that really a
syntax we would use for function calls with named parameters?
Random googling shows me that Oracle appears to use a syntax like
name => value
This is actually a feature that I would like to see implemented soonish, so if
anyone has input on the possible syntax consequences, please comment.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
No comments:
Post a Comment