Sunday, August 24, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch

"Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> I think everyone agrees that partial vacuums would be useful / *A Good
> Thing* but it's the implementation that is the issue.

I'm not sure how important it will really be once we have support for
dead-space-map-driven vacuum.

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

No comments: