Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] VACUUM Improvements - WIP Patch

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> I assume there is no TODO here.
>
> Well, there doesn't seem to be a TODO for partial/restartable vacuums,
> which were mentioned upthread. This is a really desirable feature for
> big databases and removes one of the reasons to partition large
> tables.

I would agree that partial vacuums would be very useful.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> merlin
>

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers