Saturday, July 26, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] Transaction-controlled robustness for replication

On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 10:17 +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
>
> > Expensive as in we need to parse and handle each statement
> separately.
> > If we have a single parameter then much lower overhead.
>
> Is that really much of a concern when otherwise caring about network
> and i/o latency?

I believe so. Jens-Wolfhard has provided the solution it seems.

> And what about sane default settings per session and
> database, so you won't even need to explicitly set them for the
> majority of transactions?

Session pools.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

No comments: