Sunday, July 13, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3

On Jul 13, 2008, at 10:19, Tom Lane wrote:

>>> You might try running the
>>> opr_sanity regression test on this module to see if it finds any
>>> other silliness. (Procedure: insert the citext definition script
>>> into the serial_schedule list just ahead of opr_sanity, run tests,
>>> make sure you understand the reason for any diffs in the opr_sanity
>>> result. There will be at least one from the uses of text-related
>>> functions for citext.)
>
>> Thanks. Added to my list.
>
> BTW, actually a better idea would be to put citext.sql at the front of
> the list and just run the whole main regression series with it
> present.
> typ_sanity and oidjoins might possibly find issues too.

Um, stupid question (sorry, I'm not familiar with how the regression
tests are organized): serial_schedule doesn't look like a file into
which I can insert an SQL file. How would I do that?

Thanks,

David

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

No comments: