Sunday, June 29, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] VirtualXactLockTableInsert

On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > In cases where we know we will assign a real xid, can we just skip the
> > assignment of the virtual xid completely?
>
> Even if we could do this I doubt it would be a good idea. It'd destroy
> the invariant that all transactions have a vxid, which at the very least
> would create naming problems.

Ahh, no, I meant go straight to assigning a real xid, to avoid the
wasted effort in inserting a vxid *and* a real xid.

--
Simon Riggs

www.2ndQuadrant.com

PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

No comments: