Friday, May 9, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] constraint exclusion analysis caching

"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:

> Actual execution of the query in question was talking one tenth of that
> time.
>...
> but in principle it seems silly to keep paying the same penalty over and
> over again.

I would think constraint_exclusion only really makes sense if you're spending
a lot more time executing than planning queries. Either that means you're
preparing queries once and then executing them many many times or you're
planning much slower queries where planning time is insignificant compared to
the time to execute them.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB

http://www.enterprisedb.com

Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

No comments: