Re: [HACKERS] code coverage patch

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

> I have uploaded an example run here:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/coverage/
>
> Current test coverage is about 66% overall.

With some pretty glaring gaps: 0% coverage of geqo, 0% coverage of logtape
which implies no tuplesorts are spilling to disk, no coverage of mark/restore
on index scans...

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers