Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL future ideas

2008/9/27 Douglas McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc> wrote:
>> If
>> some parts of PostgreSQL are not performance bottlenecks, and they are
>> extremely complicated to write in C, and very easy to write in something
>> else common and simple (I've never used LUA myself?), I imagine it would be
>> acceptable to the community.
>
> As long as they can expose their interfaces using the standard PG
> function call interface, and use the documented SPI mechanism to talk
> to the rest of the back end. Stuff that hooks into undocumented or
> unstable parts of the code would be much less viable.
>
> -Doug
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

I think that C is the best language for Postgresql. C++ has a little
thinks that make not good for performance.
Why people want to make more understable code touching the language?.
Simplify documentation for programmmers. Thats was the idea in the beggining.

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general