> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>> Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Oh, yes - of course. I wonder if we should give the static text boxes
>>>>> a thin border so it's obviously they are there, even when empty? At
>>>>> the moment it just looks odd.
>>>>>
>>>> I tried many things but didn't manage to get a border, thin or fat.
>>>> Perhaps wa can just put an N/A text on each static box? See attached patch.
>>> Maybe use a disabled text box instead?
>>>
>> I thought about it too but wondered how many users will try to find a
>> way to enable them.
>>
>> If you still thinks it's a better idea, I'll work on it asap.
>
> Is there any reason why we don't just stick the current values in the
> main textboxes?
>
The current values could be the settings ones or the table ones. If we
put the current values in the main textboxes, we will have to first
check that at least one textbox value is different from the current
value. If we find a difference, we could save the table settings.
This is a bit hard, but not impossible.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com
--
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
No comments:
Post a Comment