Re: [HACKERS] code coverage patch

Korry Douglas wrote:
>> 1) Use bison's -o option to put the output file in the right place
>> directly,
>> if we are dealing with bison (and don't bother to support code coverage
>> analysis with other yaccs), or
>>
>> 2) Run a pattern replacement across the grammar output files as their are
>> renamed.
>
> Why not use the %output directive in the grammar file instead; that way
> you don't need to add any special flags to the Makefile.

I think only bison supports that directive.

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers