---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Well, the stuff included into the dump by pg_dump -v is informative,
> > too. But we stopped doing that by default because of complaints.
> > I remain unconvinced that this proposal won't suffer the same fate.
>
> I think it would be reasonable to only include the list of options used in
> the dump if you use one that changes what appears in the dump. That way,
> you wouldn't see anything by default. But if you make a modification that
> will likely break a diff with an existing dump done with the default
> parameters, the option change that introduced that should show at the very
> beginning.
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
EnterpriseDB
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
No comments:
Post a Comment