> Josh, Michael, Selena,
>
> Most of us know from SPI and previous attempts at PostgreSQL incorporation
> that running an NPO requires a pretty significant time commitment. Yet,
> the bylaws thread and the pgus web site have languished without any
> regular attention from the three of you because you're busy with your
> jobs.
JoshB,
Selena, Michael and I are currently discussing all components of the
comments we receive. We stopped on Friday and are set to take it up
again this week.
> I'm wondering if it's actually realistic to launch PGUS if we can't even
> get it together to get the bylaws finalized. Starting another PostgreSQL
> NPO which will be inactive due to lack of volunteer time is not a good way
> for any of us to contribute.
That is certainly a valid concern but I don't think it applies here as
everyone is working very hard. It would be helpful to everyone involved
if you would stop making assumptions about a situation.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Sent via pgus-general mailing list (pgus-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgus-general
No comments:
Post a Comment