Re: [HACKERS] why copy tuple in the end of trigger when nothing changed in NEW OLD record variable

Tom Lane,

er, your explanation is reasonable.

But at least the comment
if (newtuple != tuple) /* modified by Trigger(s) */
{
.....
is likely to misdirect us.

It took me a few hours to figure it out. :-(

======= 2008-06-10 23:43:00 In your letter you say:=======

>"billy" <billywq@163.com> writes:
>> I think we can add some judgment conditions in function plpgsql_exec_trigger() to avoid this problem.
>
>I don't especially see the point of adding extra complexity here.
>AFAICS you are talking about avoiding one or two palloc/pfree
>cycles, which is surely down in the noise compared to the cost of
>calling a plpgsql trigger.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

　　　　　　　　billy
　　　　　　　　billywq@163.com
　　　　　　　　　　2008-06-11

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers