Re: [HACKERS] regex cache

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I'm doing some analysis of PostgreSQL site traffic, and am being frequently
> hung up by the compile-time-fixed size of our regex cache (32 regexes, per
> MAX_CACHED_RES). Is there a reason why it would be hard to use work_mem
> or some other dynamically changeable limit for regex caching?

Hmmm ... Spencer's regex library makes a point of hiding its internal
representation of a compiled regex from the calling code. So measuring
the size of the regex cache in bytes would involve doing a lot of
violence to that API. We could certainly allow the size of the cache
measured in number-of-regexes to be controlled, though.

Having said that, I'm not sure it'd help your problem. If your query is
using more than 32 regexes concurrently, it likely is using $BIGNUM
regexes concurrently. How do we fix that?

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers