Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Re: [HACKERS] Overhauling GUCS

Am Monday, 18. August 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> The impression I get every time this comes up is that various people
> have different problems they want to solve that (they think) require
> redesign of the way GUC works.  Those complicated solutions arise from
> attempting to satisfy N different demands simultaneously.

Which may be the reason that I have been getting the impression that
the "Problems" and the proposed resolutions on
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/GUCS_Overhaul are not really closely related.
I can agree with the Problems, but then I am lost.

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

No comments: