Saturday, August 23, 2008

[GENERAL] psql vs. pgadmin3 was:can't get UPDATE ... RETURNING ... INTO ... to compile successfully

On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:34:53 -0600
"Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:

> Glad you got your problem resolved. I have to admit I tend to
> mostly use psql to interact with postgres. Nothing against
> PGAdmin III, it's good software. I just tend to feel more comfy
> scripting things than clicking things. Whether you're using
> pgadmin III or psql, it's important that you have the right
> version. For pgadmin it's usually best to always have the latest
> version, and with psql the one that matches your db.

Is there any secret I don't know?
I mostly use pgadmin because:
1) It is easier to cut and paste code and results
2) It's easier to open several connections
3) you've the object structure to navigate

But I miss psql auto completion.

I know I can call an external editor that would make cut&paste
easier in psql but I'll lose autocompletion and I've had some issues
with pgadmin search&replace and regexp, so I definitively would
enjoy psql more... but what about the rest?

--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

No comments: