Re: [GENERAL] Forcibly vacating locks

>> > >> 2) Is there any hostility about the notion of implementing this feature
>> > >> into Postgres?
>> > >
>> > > Probabably --- it seems like a narrow use case.
>> >
>> > I'll consider this to be the definite answer unless I hear a dissenting
>> > opinion in the next few days.
>>
>> Yea, I might be wrong.
>
> I think you're very right. Don't ever want to see locks disappearing
> because of a timeout, sorry Laurent.
>

OK, thanks all for the replies.

Laurent Birtz

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general