On Jun 17, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Scott Ribe wrote:Actually, no (at least in 8.2). CLUSTER grabs an exclusive lock before it does any work meaning that it can't deadlock by itself. Of course you could always do something like
BOOM! Deadlock.
No more likely than with the current cluster command. Acquiring the lock is
the same risk; but it is held for much less time.
BEGIN;
SELECT * FROM a;
CLUSTER .. ON a;
COMMIT;
Which does introduce the risk of a deadlock
Really!!? Am I missing something? How can a single transaction, running synchronous commands, deadlock itself!
Best regards,
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
No comments:
Post a Comment